In writing about Judge Samuel Alito's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court, Hendrick Hertzberg says Democrats should not worry about Republicans exercising the "nuclear option" and ending the filibuster for judicial nominations.
"Barring some surprising revelation, a filibuster seems unlikely. But, if the Democrats find cause to decide otherwise, they should not feel they are betraying their small-ìdî principles. The filibuster is an affront to commonly understood democratic norms, but then so is the Senate. In the three elections that produced the current lineup -- those of 2000, 2002, and 2004 -- all Republican candidates received about ninety-five million votes, while all Democratic candidates got almost ninety-eight million. The perverse result is a ten-seat Republican majority. The worst that could happen is that the Republicans would abolish the filibuster for judicial nominations, a big first step toward abolishing it altogether. In the long run, or maybe not so long, that would be good for liberal governance. What goes up must come down."