Iíve only seen the trailer. The movie wonít open until next Friday. But from what Iíve seen I can tell you Death of a President is as tasteless as it is obscene. Itís styled as an "investigative documentary." Mixing real news footage with dramatized segments, it depicts a fictional 2007 assassination of President Bush.
I'm a libertarian when it comes to what people can see or hear but this film tests my libertarian principles. This is exploitive trash. To release it just days before a mid-term election is shameless.
A civilized society sets some limits on what can be sold in the market. It's illegal to sell babies or body parts, narcotics, prostitution, or hard-core pornography. Why should it be legal to sell a movie about assassinating a sitting president?
Yet we're a democracy, and I donít like the idea of banning any form of speech, no matter how sick and warped it may be. This film doesnít try to make a political point, but suppose it did? Suppose a film portrayed scenes of political violence as a means of conveying a political message? Once we start banning this kind of thing weíre on a slippery slope to Big Brother. I don't want government deciding what kind of speech should be banned on the basis of its content.
So my reluctant conclusion is that -- as long as it doesn't incite violence -- the film should be allowed to be released.
But that doesnít mean we have to watch it. In fact, we ought to teach the producers and movie houses a lesson they wonít forget. Letís show them shameful sensationalism like this doesnít sell.
Here's my strong recommendation: Donít pay good money to see this movie.
-- Guest contributor Robert Reich was Labor Secretary in the Clinton administration and is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley.
October 24, 2006
Get a political job!: Check out Political Wire's extensive job board for the latest listings.
PREMIUM BLOG AD
BLOG ADS
GOOGLE ADS
The largest collection of political memorabilia in one place.