Bloomberg: "As the Supreme Court weighs the challenge to the 2010 health-care overhaul, there's a cautionary tale for those who may have found hope in the way the justices picked apart the government's arguments defending the law... In 2009, the justices were equally as picky in questioning government lawyers in arguments of an appeal of the 1965 Voting Rights Act -- and left the law intact in an 8-1 ruling."