“The glaring errors became clear soon after a former Wisconsin judge issued subpoenas earlier this month in a Republican review of the state’s 2020 presidential election. Some of the requests referred to the wrong city. At least one was sent to an official who doesn’t oversee elections. A Latin phrase included in the demands for records and testimony was misspelled,” the Washington Post reports.
“Michael Gableman, the former judge leading the review, admitted days later that he does not have ‘a comprehensive understanding or even any understanding of how elections work.’ He then backed off some of his subpoena demands before reversing course again, telling a local radio host that officials would still be required to testify.”
“The latest round of reversals and blunders is intensifying calls to end the probe.”Save to Favorites