Historian Julian Zelizer writes about an unusual Zoom call last summer in which Donald Trump tried to influence a group of historians to rate his presidency more highly.
“But if anything, our conversation with the former president underscored common criticisms: that he construed the presidency as a forum to prove his dealmaking prowess; that he sought flattery and believed too much of his own spin; that he dismissed substantive criticism as misinformed, politically motivated, ethically compromised, or otherwise cynical.”

Save to Favorites
