“Unless she’s indicted, Hillary Clinton will win the Democratic nomination,” Charles Krauthammer writes.
“That kind of sentence is rarely written about a major presidential candidate. But I don’t see a realistic third alternative… Clinton is now hostage to the various investigations — the FBI, Congress, the courts — of her e-mails. The issue has already damaged her seriously by highlighting once again her congenital inability to speak truthfully. When the scandal broke in March, she said unequivocally that she ‘did not e-mail any classified material to anyone.’ That’s now been shown to be unequivocally false. After all, the inspector general of the intelligence community referred her e-mails to the Justice Department precisely because they contain classified material.”
“The fallback — every Clinton defense has a fallback — is that she did not mishandle any material ‘marked’ classified. But that’s absurd. Who could even have been in a position to mark classified something she composed and sent on her own private e-mail system?”


?Political Trivia
Eight moments in political history. Put them on a timeline.
Play →
Five senators. Three bills. Can you guess how they all voted?
Play →
Nine Justices. One case. How did they rule?
Play →
Do you have your finger on the pulse of America?
Play →
Four questions a day.
Play →
A new game every day.