David Wasserman doesn’t expect the Supreme Court’s decision this week on the Voting Rights Act to dramatically alter the current shape of congressional districts or redistricting in the long term. But on other matters such as voter ID laws, early voting, and polling locations, the effective end of the preclearance era could be a different story.

From our sponsor: The Cook Political Report is offering Political Wire readers a limited time, discounted rate for a six month trial subscription. Subscribers will have access to overviews of the national political landscape from Charlie Cook and Amy Walter, and timely ratings and analysis of every single House and Senate race from Jennifer Duffy and David Wasserman.

It’s highly recommended. Subscribe now before the offer expires.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) has signed the Lone Star State’s new congressional map into law, “ending the state’s long and twisted redistricting saga of the 2012 cycle,” Roll Call reports.

“The governor’s approval comes one day after the Supreme Court gutted a provision in the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that forced Texas to seek federal approval for any changes to its voting laws — including its congressional maps. The state was one of several covered by Section 5 because, according to the original law, it had a history of discrimination in its voting practices.”

Charlie Cook argues that the GOP’s “arguably rigged House majority” — achieved through the power of redistricting — could be a curse disguised as a blessing.

“They clearly did everything they could to purge Democratic voters from their districts ahead of 2012, no matter whether those voters were white, black, Hispanic, left-handed, or right-minded–just as Democrats would have done had the roles been reversed. But in the process of quarantining Democrats, Republicans effectively purged millions of minority voters from their own districts, and that should raise a warning flag. By drawing themselves into safe, lily-white strongholds, have Republicans inadvertently boxed themselves into an alternate universe that bears little resemblance to the rest of the country?”

John Sides dismisses the idea that gerrymandering has led to our polarized politics.

“The most important influence on how members of Congress vote is not their constituents, but their party. This makes them out-of-step not only with the average American… but also, and ironically, with even their base. Members are more partisan than even voters in their party.”

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) said that surprise redistricting effort from the members of his party in the state Senate was something he only learned about right before it happened, the Fredericksburg Star reports.

Said McDonnell: “I certainly don’t think that’s a good way to do business.”

“He said he has not yet spoken to House leadership about the redistricting issue. The Senate redistricting plan must go to the House next.”

GOP pollster Bill McInturff:

“Republicans captured 49.4% of the two-party vote for Congress in 2012, yet won 54% of the seats in the House. This gap between the Republican vote and the seats they won is on the high side, but certainly not without precedent over the past 40 years. If you began your career as a Republican trying to win the House in the 1970s and 1980s, you would adopt, as I do, the borrowed adage ‘there’s no crying in redistricting.'”

“Since 2004, Rhode Island’s population has dropped by more than 24,000 people, an exodus unprecedented in the state’s history,” the Providence Journal reports.

The New York Times notes it’s likely the state will lose a congressional seat in the next redistricting in 2020.

Google has a map featuring the newly-redrawn congressional districts for almost every state.

The exception is Kansas, which hasn’t finalized their new districts.  There are also court challenges pending in several states, so there may be additional changes in the coming weeks.

John Avlon looks at the latest round of gerrymandering and notes “the weasel-y-ness is worse than ever, with outrages and embarrassments covered mostly by local media.”

“Legislators from both parties will
continue to get away with the maximum amount of self-dealing and
self-interest they can get away with – unless they feel it is no longer
in their self-interest because of citizen pressure. That’s why these
local tales of rigging the system of redistricting should matter to you,
no matter what state you live in.”

The Supreme Court instructed the district court that overturned and
redrew the Texas Legislature’s redistricting map to try again, The New
York Times reports. In an unsigned unanimous decision, the Justices said
“the lower court had not paid enough deference to the Legislature’s
choices and had improperly substituted its own values for those of
elected officials.”

“The justices acted just 11 days after hearing
arguments in the case. Primaries in Texas had already been moved back to
April. For those primaries to proceed, officials there said, an answer
from the courts was needed by Feb. 1… As many as four House seats hang
in the balance, experts in election administration say.”

The Arizona Republic
reports that the Arizona Supreme Court reinstated the chair of the
state’s Independent Redistricting Commission Colleen Mathis, delivering a
rebuke to Gov. Jan Brewer (R) and the Republican-controlled state
Senate who ousted Mathis earlier this month.

Laurie Roberts:
“Personally, I think the redistricting commission got the congressional
maps wrong… Having said that, the remedy isn’t to go all banana
republic(an) on us and try to toss the chairman on some trumped up
charges. This not only makes the Republicans look desperate, it puts
their oself interest on display in a most unflattering fashion. The
Republicans should just do what every red-blooded, God fearing, flag
waving American does: Sue. Challenge the maps, once they’re finalized,
in court. And quit whining.”

The Austin American-Statesman
reports that Texas will have to defend its redistricting plans in
court, as a “panel of federal judges…ordered a trial on the state’s
new redistricting plan for the state House, state Senate, and the U.S.
House of Representatives.”

“The redistricting maps drawn earlier this
year by the Legislature must get approval from the federal government –
in this case the Washington court – before the new maps can be enacted. A
history of racial and ethnic discrimination in Texas and several other
mostly southern states necessitates pre-clearance, which is outlined the
Voting Rights Act… Another panel of federal judges in San Antonio has
been hearing from the Mexican American Legislative Caucus and other
plaintiffs suing the state for creating redistricting maps that they say
dilute the minority vote and violate the U.S. Constitution. As the
Washington court ponders pre-clearance of the maps, the San Antonio
court has been working on creating interim maps to be used for the March
primaries.”

Arizona’s Republican-controlled state Senate voted to endorse Gov. Jan Brewer’s (R) removal of the independent chair of the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, “triggering a rush to court and the likely start of an unprecedented constitutional battle,” the Arizona Republic reports.

“The actions are unprecedented in Arizona history; it’s only the second time since the independent commission was established by voters 11 years ago that the panel has taken on the task of drawing political boundaries.”

John Avlon: “If Brewer gets away with this power grab, it will suddenly appear on the
menu of every other governor looking to artificially preserve his or
her party’s hold on power, Republican or Democrat. It is nothing less
than an attempt to hijack representative democracy.”