Nate Silver: “Democrats don’t merely have to reciprocate — tit-for-tat might be a game-theory optimal strategy over the long run, but it doesn’t work as well if you’re always a half-step behind. They should also consider acting preemptively, something few Democrats other than Beto O’Rourke of all people have dared to suggest.”
“In the long run, voters could turn against aggressive gerrymandering, especially if they see their longstanding moderate members of Congress replaced by partisan hacks. But to change that requires Congressional action, a new court, or a constitutional amendment — and all of those require winning elections. Democrats can’t be too proud to play by the rules of the game as they’ve so clearly been established under Roberts: they might even come out ahead.”


?Political Trivia
Eight moments in political history. Put them on a timeline.
Play →
Five senators. Three bills. Can you guess how they all voted?
Play →
Nine Justices. One case. How did they rule?
Play →
Do you have your finger on the pulse of America?
Play →
Four questions a day.
Play →
A new game every day.